Serving New York, New Jersey and Connecticut

Email, Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace

Email and Microsoft 365 Forensics for Disputed Messages

A printed email carries little weight; the native message, its headers and the tenant's audit trail are where we look for where it came from. Our team preserves mailboxes and audit records, authenticates disputed messages, and traces forwarding rules, sign ins and shared files to the accounts involved. Across our email practice we have collected thousands of mailboxes and given hundreds of email related depositions and testimony engagements.

Call (212) 561-5860

Source mapping and preservation precede review; reconciliation follows the records through production.
Source mapping and preservation precede review; reconciliation follows the records through production.
Diagram description

The connected groups follow material through source mapping, preservation, collection or review, and reconciliation. Exceptions and handling records stay with the material.

  • Map sources: Custodians; Accounts and devices.
  • Preserve: Hold and collect; Track exceptions.
  • Review: Search and examine; Record decisions.
  • Produce: Apply specification; Reconcile output.

A connected record from source to production.

Preserve Native Messages and Available Audit Records

Counsel can start with the people, account types, relevant period and production deadline. We arrange access with the authorized account holder or administrator. Routine remote collection allows email users to keep working, which simplifies coordination with clients in apartments, home offices and workplaces across the region.

For Microsoft 365, the source list can include Outlook messages, attachments, OneDrive and SharePoint files and activity logs. A Gmail or Google Workspace matter may include messages, Google Drive documents and Workspace records. We identify the available sources and collection method for the actual account.

Tell us whether the case turns on a disputed message, forwarding, a communication pattern or company information sent outside the business. That question determines which supporting logs, recipient records and linked files belong in the examination.

The delivery plan can include an evidence inventory, authentication findings, a communication timeline and material for review or production. We coordinate formats and reporting with the New York retaining team and can provide expert support for deposition and testimony.

Remote Collection While Email Stays in Use

Routine authorized collection allows continued account use. We coordinate access and the evidence scope with the account holder or administrator, then preserve the original messages and agreed supporting records.

Get a Free Consultation

Tell Us Which Messages Are Disputed

Name the mailboxes, the messages and the dates. We will plan a native collection that keeps the audit trail intact on a free call.

Get a Free Consultation

(212) 561-586024/7: (800) 868-8189

A screenshot or forwarded message strips away technical context. GDF preserves native messages and the records around them, then correlates mailbox, cloud, identity, transport, and endpoint data. The approach supports authenticity disputes, eDiscovery, account compromise, insider activity, and delivery questions.

Correlate Mailbox, Identity and Shared File Activity

Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace contain multiple evidence sources with different availability and retention periods. Mailbox contents, message trace data, unified audit logs, sign in events, inbox rules, OAuth grants, administrative changes, and security alerts each follow their own retention schedule. Availability depends on workload, license, audit configuration, retention policy, event age, and provider changes. A preservation plan records those conditions, legal holds, exports, and collection timestamps.

For litigation, the work can be aligned with eDiscovery data preservation and production requirements. For a security event, collection proceeds alongside containment so remediation does not erase the facts needed to understand entry, persistence, or misuse.

Authenticate, Correlate, Test

Email authentication results, routing headers, Message IDs, MIME structure, server timestamps, and domain controls are examined together. A header can be forged; the conclusion depends on the full path and corroborating records. For suspected business email compromise, analysts also look for session anomalies, malicious forwarding, application consent, credential resets, unusual access, and payment thread manipulation.

The scope covers native MSG, EML, PST, MBOX, and supported cloud collections; mailbox rule, forwarding, delegate, and permission review; Microsoft Entra and Google identity event correlation; phishing path, sender domain, and attachment analysis; and chronologies prepared for counsel, insurers, and response teams.

Findings That Match What the Record Shows

A successful login identifies an account event; to reach the person at the keyboard we look at the records around it. IP reputation, geolocation, device identifiers, multifactor records, and user agent data can narrow an explanation but may be shared, proxied, stale, or manipulated. Sender authentication rests on headers and authentication results beyond the display name. Reports separate established facts from inferences and identify any additional source worth examining.

Get a Free ConsultationOr call (212) 561-5860

Preserve the Mailbox Before Retention Runs Out

On a free, confidential call a senior examiner reviews the accounts, the disputed messages and the deadline, and tells you what to preserve today.

Get a Free Consultation

Tell Us About Your Matter

Your request is handled in confidence. Include the deadline, the devices, accounts or systems involved, and the best way to reach you for the first call.

Prefer email? Write to info@evestigate.com. 24/7 hotline: (800) 868-8189.

Include deadline and evidence type.

Screened via Cloudflare Turnstile.

Loading security check.

GDF does not accept pro se litigation cases, and GDF may decline matrimonial or family law cases at our discretion.

Reviewed by Joseph Caruso, Founder, CEO and CTO, CISSP. Last reviewed .